But the chip scores significantly lower than the in the Geekbench 4 test. Reproduction of any part of this website in its entirety or partially or in any form or medium without prior written permission is prohibited. Ideally, each dot should be positioned on top of its respective square. DeviceSpecifications is not responsible for any omissions, inaccuracies or other errors in the information it publishes. From battery life to cellular modem down to memory management, smartphones from different brands are so unique they might as well be different platforms.
Especially without an industry standard, there will never be a point that everyone can agree on how the comparison starts and where the discussions will go. The M4 cores offer the highest per-core performance in the Android world with the Kryo Gold in the Mi 9's Snapdragon 855 a distant second. Not unless the difference is as clear as night and day. The iPhones have an advantage over their Android rivals because Apple designs its processors and software in-house. Photo: Samsung It seems Samsung is still struggling to match the performance of the iPhone.
The Galaxy S10 and S10e also have the same processor as the S10+, so I expect similar benchmark results. Snapdragon 855 vs Exynos 9820 benchmarks Be sure to check out our deep dives for a breakdown of the key spec differences between the Snapdragon 855 and Exynos 9820. It just says it's not the fastest. The raw performance, while an improvement over the previous Kirin 970, ins't wasn't par with what the latest Apple, Qualcomm and Samsung chips offer. The closer the actual colors are to the target ones, the better. Isn't the main benefit of better performing chips that they perform tasks faster and can go to a power-efficient idle state much sooner?.
The S10+ is faster than other Android phones on this test. These are combined with two smaller and four power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores. The Plus variant would get a triple camera system on the back and dual selfie cameras. Benchmarks aside, individual hardware performance is still not a credible measure of end-user experience. Last year's Galaxy S9 hit 4,634, so that comes out to a 21 percent improvement. Besides some obvious software improvements, the new M4 microarchitecture also seems to have upped the performance.
Likely what this means is that Samsung has solved some of the most important. Finally, the Data Manipulation score is more single-thread limited workload. The Snapdragon 855 promises a 45% performance boost and 20% better graphics performance over its predecessor Snapdragon 845, which powers the Galaxy S9. We noticed a measurable amount of inconsistency with the Intel 600p, as well. Also, then there are no benchmarks one to one to worry about. Gamers will definitely want to opt for a Snapdragon 855 handset where available. Our S10+ review unit is the Exynos variety.
Huawei has made its Performance mode available to anyone and you can find the switch in the Battery settings of the P30 Pro. Oddly, the S10 falls below some of its rivals here, even those that are running older hardware. That's usually the 1 reason why I buy new phones. As a result, it can tightly integrate the hardware and software to deliver maximum performance and energy efficiency. An exception to the rest of our data, which makes the following results all the more alarming, as the Exynos model usually starts slower than the Snapdragon. The handset scored 3,413 points in single-core and 10,256 points in multi-core tests.
These are accompanied by four Cortex-A55 cores. I'll take an unlocked bootloader over the performance boost any day of the week! Synthetic benchmarks Samsung's fresh new S10 lineup is once again powered by the best the industry can offer - the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 or Samsung's in-house Exynos 9820 chipset, depending on the market. However, the cores configuration is different. The Pixel 3 took a leisurely 2:53, while the OnePlus 6T took a longer 3:45. Additionally, we have to point out that under sustained load the Galaxy S10+ does heat up considerably, and throttles a bit think 10% drop in Antutu scores after 6 runs and no more in subsequent runs. Our Galaxy S10+ review unit is currently the top performing smartphone we've tested so far. The S10+ still manages to inch ahead of the Kirin 980-powered Mates.
Battery health and ram have a much bigger influence on how well a phone ages imo. These days what's around that SoC matters even more. Samsung will make the Galaxy S10 lineup official , but thanks to a new leak, posted on , we already know what kind of performance we can expect from the largest model. Just weeks before the official unveiling, the Galaxy S10 Plus benchmark results have been spotted. Still, the , powered by an Apple designed A12 Bionic chip, is faster on this test.